http://allwriting.net/ We are a Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), registered in the United States of America, specializing in providing custom written research papers, term papers, essays or dissertations for the students studying in the United States of America, The United Kingdom of Great Britain, Canada, Australia and other English speaking countries on all academic levels, by contracting freelance writers from around the world. en-us http://allwriting.net/cp_readfull.php?id=361759 This is Lab Report . I am studying BEng(Hons) Electrical and Electronic Engineering Course in one of the British universities in UK . I have done the two Experiments and I think the in the Results sheet in Practical 1 , table 1 is not correct Please make sure it is correct or not , if not please correct it . Each Experiment must follow the required Structure of the Lab Report which is in The Assignment Sheet I attached that as well . Discussion section should be the most substantial part of the report . This is where the results of the experiment are reported and discussed . Any significance in the work reported here must be made clear by detailed discussions . Consider this section to be the "" meat "" of the report while other section constitute the rest of the "" ingredients "" . Please write Table of Content . The work must be well organized and Structure I need to get at least A . In practical one you need to calculate the sensitivity . This Lab Report should include Graphs , Pictures and Calculation as well . Please make sure you will make correctly and finish it on the day promised because really I don"t have enough time . I need a professional work I need A . Thank You . http://allwriting.net/cp_readfull.php?id=361891 i do have a group prisantion about this topic , each one of us need to speck about 2 min's , Do something regarding Forensic Scientists and how they must stay within their social contract of doing their job correctly so as to keep the integrity of the evidence they collect and so on. This is morally right to do. Cooper in the Omagh bombings (R v Sean Hoey) did not wear her personal protective equipment at the scenes which risked contamination and then she lied about not wearing it in court, but this goes against the agreed contract she has to do regarding her job. Look up that case and write something along those lines if you think that that links to Contractualism. I think it does but I'm not sure * don't forget the slides, 3 will be enough http://allwriting.net/cp_readfull.php?id=361894 Detail the main argument of the book/article. It is the "thesis" and not the detail that is important Try to locate the work in the broader analysis of European integration; to isolate its distinctive contribution; to say what is new about the book/article and how it is different from the conclusions of other authors. The main section of your work should offer: a critical appraisal of the book/article. Say what its strengths and weaknesses are as a piece of analysis. Are its assumptions plausible? Are they consistent? Do they fit the facts? Etc. This section is clearly the most important it is were you allow your analytical skills to come to the fore and it is the area in which you will be most able to offer value added. please use a clear english language , and not weak. Whilst referencing is not essential for the article review, if you do reference or draw upon material then you should include a full bibliography using the Harvard system for referencing http://allwriting.net/cp_readfull.php?id=361727 choose one please : Assignment 1. Two years ago Browns Insurance Services invested a lot of money in new technology at their call centre in North East England. Unfortunately, the technology failed to support the activities undertaken in the call centre and the Company ended up having to spend a lot of extra money to rectify the problem. The CEO, Mr Sebastian Green, was rather surprised that the initial decision had been so bad, given that it had been taken by the Board during a week-end away at a Conference Centre. He had anticipated that as a group they would be able to make a better decision than he would have done alone. Also, he had assumed that taking the Board away for the week-end would give them a period of time to work exclusively on the problem without any external influences or disruptions. The Board is made up of 8 male executives all with a strong insurance or finance background, aged between 45 and 55 years. Over the next two years the Board will have to make several more important strategic decisions. Mr Green is very concerned that they may make the same mistakes again so has commissioned you to write a report that outlines contemporary theory and research on group decision making (GDM) to help them understand better some of the advantages of group decision making, why these advantages are not always realised and how these advantages can actually be realised. The report should include: A brief introduction setting the scene A review of theory and research on the advantages of group decision making and of the factors that limit the effectiveness of group decision making (highlighting those that are particularly relevant for Browns Insurance Services). A critical review of the approaches designed to improve group decision making outlining possible strengths and weaknesses of each approach and the particular relevance of these for Browns Insurance Services. Some specific recommendations. We suggest that you structure your report in the following way: A brief introduction outlining the background to the report that includes: a brief description of the problem, the aims and objective of the report, the potential value of the report to Browns, and how the report is to be structured to achieve these aims/objectives (i.e. the major sections). A section reviewing the extant literature on group decision making indicating the potential advantages of this approach and explaining why these are often not realised, highlighting those aspects likely to be particularly relevant to Browns and their previous decision. A section reviewing ways of improving group decision making (particularly those of relevance to Browns) and their strengths and weakness. Sections 2 and 3 should be properly referenced as in a formal academic essay. A conclusion briefly indicating how the initial objective have been met, outlining some recommendations to Browns about how future Board decision should be taken. Assignment Two JDJ Pharmaceuticals is planning to start manufacturing a new pesticide (Cyclon) in one of its plants on the edge of Songfield, a large town in the North of England. There are two big housing developments close to the plant and the Company is required to inform all residents about their manufacturing plans and associated risks. They have the results of two risk assessments, both of which show that the levels of pollution that will be generated by the production process are much below the thresholds set by EU guidelines. One of these assessments was completed by the Company, the other by an independent set of consultants. Last time they tried to communicate their pesticide manufacturing plans to the public there was a huge public outcry and the resulting protests were so strong that it was decided to drop the project. The managing director of JDJ Pharmaceuticals, Dr Smith, is convinced that the previous failure was due to a lack of understanding of how the public responds to risk when designing their communications. Dr Smith has asked you to prepare a report to advise them about the factors that affect how the public perceives and acts in the face of risk and the implications this has for developing effective and sensitive risk communications. The report should include: A brief introduction setting the scene A review of theory and research on how the public perceives and acts in the face of risk, including some of the reasons why the public s response is different from those predicted by formal risk analyses and a review of the individual and social processes involved. A review of procedures and approaches that that the Company might take to improve the situation (e.g. building trust, increased public participation, better ways of communicating statistical risk, using comparators, mental models approach etc) assessing each critically in the context of this problem. We suggest that you structure your report in the following way: A brief introduction outlining the background to the problem, the aims and objective, how the report is to be structured to achieve these aims/objectives (i.e. the major sections) and the value of the report A section reviewing the extant literature on how the public perceive and act in the face of risk (the individuals and social processes, major theories etc) and the relevance of these for managing the situation at JDJ Pharmaceuticals. In this section all aspects should be properly referenced and focused on the case. A section reviewing ways of improving risk communication in general, their strengths and weakness and the relevance of all of this for the situation. A conclusion outlining some recommendations for JDJ Pharmaceuticals. Assignment 3 Racter & Grimble are a major manufacturer of food and drinks in the UK. They have a large sales force spread throughout the UK that sells their products to supermarkets, wholesalers, cash and carries and to small retailers. The Company is planning to invest in a new fleet of cars for the sales force and is currently considering five options: Car 1: Currently being used by the workforce. It is a mid-range saloon car that is quite expensive to buy though has proven to be reasonably reliable and efficient over the last 5 years and is quite comfortable for travel. Car 2: A new top of the range saloon car that is more expensive than 1 but has a particularly good record on efficiency and safety as well as looking very good. This is very popular amongst the sales reps. Car 3: A mid range saloon car that is cheaper than 1 and 2 and is noted for being particularly efficient on fuel, though not particularly comfortable for drivers or passengers. It holds its value so will depreciate much less than the other cars Car 4: Another mid range saloon car that is slightly cheaper than Car 3. It looks good and is comfortable for drivers and passengers, but is not particularly efficient on fuel and its value depreciates faster than Car 3. There is a slight concern that it may be less reliable and the spares for this car are expensive given that they come from overseas. Car 5: A bottom of the range saloon car that is the cheapest option. It actually looks quite good and is efficient on fuel, but is not at all comfortable to drive and is the worst for depreciation. It is the car that the reps like least and the spares are relatively expensive. It is imperative that Racter & Grimble finds the best value solution that can be implemented, taking account of the key attributes thought to be important by the different stakeholders. Some of these attributes are present in the descriptions of the cars above (e.g. efficiency, comfort, look of car) you should add others that you think are likely to be important for the different stakeholders (e.g. customers, shareholders, sales-staff and their families, senior managers) and that can be justified and explained to the Board. The Board has asked you to prepare a report outlining the appropriateness of SMART to help them make this decision. The report should include: Some indication of why decision aids are needed/useful, why SMART is appropriate, the steps involved in undertaking SMART (explaining the purpose of each) and the activities that would need to be undertaken in this particular situation. Some illustration of the outputs of each stage, how they should be interpreted and used to make the final decision, highlighting issues around sensitivity testing, stakeholder modelling and requisite decision modelling An appraisal of the strengths and weaknesses of applying SMART to this situation We suggest that you structure your report in the following way: An introduction outlining the background to the report, (e.g. why decision aids are necessary and useful (in context of semester 1 issues), their underlying logic, the decision analysis process, requisite decision modelling and why SMART is appropriate in this situation), the aims and objectives of the report and its structure i.e. the major sections and their purpose. A section outlining the steps taken when undertaking a SMART, how they would be resolved in this situation, their purpose and the kinds of outputs that are generated and how these should be interpreted (illustrate with plausible outputs based on your estimations/guesses of the kinds of data you might get if applying SMART for real in this situation). Some discussion of how the SMART analysis might be used in this situation e.g. how stakeholders be kept informed, which aspects would be communicated, requisite decision modelling, sensitivity testing etc; A conclusion outlining strengths and weaknesses of SMART in this context and some recommendations to Racter & Grimble. Assignment 4 The Personnel Director of UK Airways, the biggest airline in the UK, has contacted you to help her resolve an industrial dispute with their cabin crew. While the dispute is primarily about UK Airways plans to change working practices (reducing the number of staff on long and short haul flights), there are a range of other concerns about pay (particularly overtime), shift patterns, recent cuts in the training budget and expenses and allowances. The Director has asked you to prepare a report, based on the decision-analytic approach to negotiation, indicating what this approach is and how it might be used to improve the negotiations both in terms of prescribing a process to follow and alerting her to some of the biases and pitfalls that need to be avoided if the negotiation is to be successful. The report should include: A review of theory and research on the decision-analytic approach to negotiation, its relevance to the current dispute, the insights one may get when applying the approach to the current dispute and some of the barriers to effective negotiation thinking that need to be avoided. Some consideration of the procedures that might be undertaken to resolve the dispute and how they might be applied We suggest that you structure your report in the following way: A brief introduction outlining the background to the report, a brief description of the dispute, the aims and objective of the report, its structure (i.e. the major sections of the report) and potential value. A section reviewing the key characteristics of the decision-analytic approach, applying it to the current dispute and highlighting insights and potential help that the approach may offer to understanding and improving the situation. Outline some of the barriers to effective thinking that may occur during resolution of the dispute and any ways of trying to minimise the negative effects that these barriers may have. A conclusion outlining some recommendations and why you think they may work. http://allwriting.net/cp_readfull.php?id=361897 The requirements analysis a. Should include a list of functional requirements (i.e. what the system was required to do) b. Some of these requirements may be essential and of high priority, meaning that they had to be implemented no matter what. Some other functional requirements may be desirable and could be included to a later version subject to time constraints. c. Also there should be some non functional requirements such as ease of use, speed of download, navigation design etc http://allwriting.net/cp_readfull.php?id=361901 I want the answer of all the questions in attachments (1 + 2) and the essay as well in the attachment (7). The other attachments might help the writer to answer the questions. http://allwriting.net/cp_readfull.php?id=361129 Conditions of writer: The writer should have experience in Mathematics, ICT and technology acceptance model (TAM) which was developed by Davis 1989. Conditions of proposal: 1- Use APA style. 2- make sure that you provide an accurate referencing in the text and in the reference list. 3- When you find any online article provide me by the link to this resource so I can access to them; or send it as an attachment. 4- Use articles that are published in a famous and academic journal 5- I want a weekly progress report include the articles you find and the drafts. 6- If you want to use a book provide me by the name of the book before you use it so I can check the availability of this book in library. 7- I want 60 or more than 60 reference. 8- Use academic writing. 9- In the literature review you should review the studies that have been conducted in 2000-2009 unless you find resources that are very important to the study. 10- Figures and tables should be included in the literature review. PHD dissertation proposal guidelines: Proposal content The content of the dissertation proposal needs to address the following elements, generally in the order as indicated: 1. Focus of the study (research question)/goals/objective - candidates should outline exactly what it is they aim to achieve/discover during their course of study. If they have framed a formal hypothesis, which they will be testing, then it should be stated here. 2. Literature review and scope of project - this section should indicate that candidates have a good working knowledge of the literature relevant to their field of study. In particular they should discuss the current state of knowledge and its present limitations. Finally, in the context of current knowledge, they should briefly describe the main elements of their proposed endeavours. They should demonstrate firstly how their PhD study will fit into the broad framework of theory and knowledge in relevant fields. Then they should indicate the extent to which their work will result in an original contribution to understanding in those fields. 3. Conceptual framework. 4. Methodology - depending on the discipline and research approach, this section will describe how the goals of the study will be achieved. Hence this section might include a description of experiments to be performed and the statistical principles of their design, data collection method and analyses, anticipated difficulties and alternative approaches to combat them. Any progress made of study should be reported here. 5. Outcomes and significance - this section should focus on a brief description of the expected outcomes of the work in general terms and the likely significance of these outcomes for the discipline and the wider community. Generally it will not be possible to predict specific answers to questions or hypotheses currently being addressed, but it will be possible to outline the benefits of answering them and the unique contribution to knowledge that candidates expect to make. 6. Figures, tables, references - the inclusion of explanatory figures and tables is encouraged. References to the literature should be provided wherever appropriate and listed in a separate section at the conclusion of the document. 7. Limitations of study.